|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
HOME > Abstract |
|
|
|
| |
1507 |
2012 |
50/2 |
128-134 |
Evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screws on CAD/CAM custom-made implant abutments CAD/CAMÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¸ÂÃãÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ ³ª»ç Ç®¸² ÅäÅ© Æò°¡
Chang-Jae Lee, Sung-Eun Yang, Seok-Gyu Kim
ÀÌâÀç, ¾ç¼ºÀº, ±è¼®±Ô

|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the screw joint stability between the CADCAM custom-made implant abutment and the prefabricated implant abutment by measuring the reverse torque value after cyclic loading.
Materials and methods: Twelve screw type implants (Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea) were embedded in aluminum cylinder with acrylic resin. The implant specimens were equally divided into 3 groups, and connected to the prefabricated titanium abutments (Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea), CADCAM custom-made titanium abutments (Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) and CADCAM custom-made zirconia abutments (Zirconia Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea). The CAD-CAM milled titanium crown (Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) was cemented on each implant abutment by resin cement. Before cyclic loading, each abutment screw was tightened to 30 Ncm and the reverse torque value was measured about 30 minutes later. After the crown specimen was subjected to the sinusoidal cyclic loading (30 to 120 N, 500,000 cycles, 2 Hz), postloading reverse torque value was measured and the reverse torque loss ratio was calculated. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis of the reverse torque loss ratio.
Results: The CADCAM custom-made titanium abutments presented higher values in reverse torque loss ratio without statistically significant differences than the prefabricated titanium abutments (P>.05). Reverse torque loss ratio of the custom-made zirconia abutments was significantly higher compared to that of the prefabricated titanium abutments (P=.014).
Conclusion: Within the limitation of the present in-vitro study, it was concluded that there was no significant difference in screw joint stability between the CADCAM custom-made titanium abutments and the prefabricated titanium abutments. On the other hand, the CADCAM custom-made zirconia abutments showed lower screw joint stability than prefabricated titanium abutments.
* Keywords: CADCAM custom-made abutment; Reverse torque value; Reverse torque loss ratio
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±¹³» °³¹ßµÈ ¸ÂÃãÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í ±â¼º ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ ¹Ýº¹ ÇÏÁß Àü°ú ÈÄÀÇ ³ª»ç Ç®¸² ÅäÅ© °ªÀ» ÃøÁ¤, ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ³ª»ç °áÇպΠ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ÃÑ 12°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® °íÁ¤Ã¼(Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea)¸¦ ¾Ë·ç¹Ì´½ ¿øÅë¿¡ ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î °íÁ¤Çϰí, ±×°ÍÀ» °¢°¢ 4°³¾¿, 3°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´²¼ °¢ ±ºº°·Î ±â¼º ƼŸ´½ Áö´ëÁÖ(Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea), ijµåÄ· ¸ÂÃãÇü ƼŸ´½ Áö´ëÁÖ(Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea), ±×¸®°í ±Ý¼Ó ¿¬°áºÎ°¡ Àִ ijµåÄ· ¸ÂÃãÇü Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Áö´ëÁÖ(Zirconia Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea)¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ¿¬°áÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±Ý¼Ó°üÀº Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ ¸ÂÃç¼ Æ¼Å¸´½À» ¹Ð¸µÇؼ Á¦ÀÛÇÑµÚ Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ ÇÕÂøÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ýº¹ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡Çϱâ Àü¿¡ Áö´ëÁÖ ³ª»ç¸¦ 30 Ncm ÅäÅ©·Î Á¶ÀÌ°í ¾à 30ºÐ ÈÄ ³ª»çÀÇ Ãʱâ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× ÈÄ ¹Ýº¹ ÇÏÁßÀ» 30 N¿¡¼ 120 NÀÇ ½ÎÀÎ °î¼±À» ÀÌ·ç´Â ¾ÐÃà·ÂÀ¸·Î 2 HzÀÇ ºóµµ·Î 50¸¸ ½ÎÀÌŬÀ» °¡Çϰí ÇÏÁß ÈÄ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Ç®¸² ÅäÅ© »ó½Ç·üÀ» ±¸ÇÏ¿©¼ ±º³¢¸® ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀÇ »ó½Ç·üÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ À§ÇØ Kruskal-Wallis test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ¼ À¯ÀǼöÁØ .05¿¡¼ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ¹Ýº¹ÇÏÁß ÈÄ ³ª»ç Ç®¸² »ó½Ç·ü¿¡¼ ±â¼º ƼŸ´½ Áö´ëÁÖ ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ¸ÂÃãÇü ƼŸ´½ Áö´ëÁÖ´Â ³ôÀº °ªÀ» º¸¿´À¸³ª À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ´Â Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(P>.05). ¹Ý¸é, ¸ÂÃãÇü Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Áö´ëÁÖ´Â ±â¼º ƼŸ´½ Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ôÀº °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(P=.014).
°á·Ð: º» ½ÇÇèÀÇ ÇÑ°è ³»¿¡¼ ijµåÄ· ¸ÂÃãÇü ƼŸ´½ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áö´ëÁÖ´Â ±â¼º ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ª»ç ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀÌ ¶³¾îÁø´Ù°í º¼ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. ¹Ý¸é, ijµåÄ· ¸ÂÃãÇü Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Áö´ëÁÖ ´Â ±â¼º ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ª»ç ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀÌ ´Ù¼Ò ¶³¾îÁø´Ù°í º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: ijµåÄ· ¸ÂÃãÇü Áö´ëÁÖ; ³ª»ç Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©; ³ª»ç Ç®¸² ÅäÅ© »ó½Ç·ü
|
|
1506 |
2012 |
50/2 |
119-127 |
Finite element analysis on the connection types of abutment and fixture ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ³»ºÎ¿¬°áÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡¼ ¿¬°áºÎÀÇ ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷ÀÇ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ºÐ¼®
Byeong-Hyeon Jung, Gyeong-Je Lee, Dong-Wan Kang
Á¤º´Çö, À̰æÁ¦, °µ¿¿Ï

|
|
Purpose: This study was performed to compare the stress distribution pattern of abutment-fixture connection area using 3-dimensional finite element model analysis when 5 different implant systems which have internal connection.
Materials and methods: For the analysis, a finite element model of implant was designed to locate at first molar area. Stress distribution was observed when vertical load of 200 N was applied at several points on the occlusal surfaces of the implants, including center, points 1.5 mm, 3.0 mm away from center and oblique load of 200 N was applied 30inclined to the implant axis. The finite element model was analyzed by using of 3G. Author (PlassoTech, California, USA).
Results: The DAS tech implant (internal step with no taper) showed more favorable stress distribution than other internally connected implants. AS compare to the situations when the loading was applied within the boundary of implants and an oblique loading was applied, it showed higher equivalent stress and equivalent elastic strain when the loading was applied beyond the boundary of implants. Regardless of loading condition, the abutments showed higher equivalent stress and equivalent elastic strain than the fixtures.
Conclusion: When the occlusal contact is afforded, the distribution of stress varies depending on the design of connection area and the location of loading. More favorable stress distribution is expected when the contact load was applied within the diameter of fixtures and the DAS tech implant (internal step with no tapering) has more benefits than the other design of internally connected implants.
* Keywords: Dental Implants; 3 Dimensional Finite Element Analysis; Occlusal Force; Internal Connection Implant; Implant-Abutment Connection
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â 3Â÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ Ư¡ÀûÀÎ ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¸¦ °®´Â 5Á¾ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ °íÁ¤Ã¼¿Í Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ ¿¬°á¹æ½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»êÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: º» ½ÇÇèÀ» À§ÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¸ðµ¨Àº ÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ºÎ¿¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ®°¡ ½Ä¸³µÇ°í »óºÎ±¸Á¶¹°·Î 3Çü ±ÝÇÕ±ÝÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î °¡Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»êÀº 200 NÀÇ ÇÏÁßÀÌ ±³ÇÕ¸éÀÇ Áß½É, Á߽ɿ¡ 1.5 mm ¿ÜÃø, Á߽ɿ¡¼ 3.0 mm ¿ÜÃø¿¡ ¼öÁ÷À¸·Î °¡ÇØÁö°í ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ÀåÃà°ú 30ÀÇ °¢µµ·Î °æ»çÇÏÁßÀÌ °¡ÇØÁöµµ·Ï ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¸ðµ¨¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇØ¼®ÀÛ¾÷Àº 3G.Author (PlassoTech, California, USA)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·ïÁ³´Ù.
°á°ú: °æ»ç°¡ ¾ø´Â ³»ºÎ°è´Ü ±¸Á¶¸¦ °¡Áö´Â DAS techÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ °æ¿ì, ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¸¦ °®´Â ´Ù¸¥ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ´õ À¯¸®ÇÑ ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»êÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ÇÏÁßÀÌ ÀÓÇöõÆ® °íÁ¤Ã¼ÀÇ ¿ÜÇü¼± À̳»¿¡ °¡ÇØÁö´Â °æ¿ì¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ¿ÜÇü¼± ¹Ù±ùÀ̳ª °æ»ç·ÂÀ¸·Î ÀüÇØÁö´Â °æ¿ì ´õ ³ôÀº ÀÀ·ÂÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç ÇÏÁßÁ¶°Ç°ú °ü°è¾øÀÌ ÀÓÇöõÆ® °íÁ¤Ã¼º¸´Ù´Â Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ ´õ Å« ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ÁýÁߵǾú´Ù.
°á·Ð: ±³ÇÕ·ÂÀÌ °¡ÇØÁ³À» ¶§ ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»êÀº ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ¿¬°áºÎÀÇ ÇüÅÂ¿Í ÇÏÁßÀÌ °¡ÇØÁö´Â À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¶ó ´Þ¶óÁ³À¸¸ç ³»ºÎ°è´Ü ±¸Á¶¸¦ °¡Áö´Â DAS techÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í °íÁ¤Ã¼ÀÇ ¿ÜÇü¼± À̳»¿¡ ÇÏÁßÀÌ °¡ÇØÁ³À» °æ¿ì¿¡ ´õ À¯¸®ÇÑ ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»êÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: Ä¡°ú¿ë ÀÓÇöõÆ®; 3Â÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®; ±³ÇÕ·Â; ÀÓÇöõÆ®-Áö´ëÁÖ ¿¬°á; ³»ºÎ¿¬°áÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ®
|
|
1505 |
2012 |
50/2 |
112-118 |
Effect of universal primer on shear bond strength between resin cement and restorative materials ´Ù¿ëµµ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ӱ¡ ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®¿Í ¼öº¹ÀçÀÇ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ °µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
Nahong Kim, June-Sung Shim, Hong-Suk Moon, Keun-Woo Lee
±è³ªÈ«, ½ÉÁؼº, ¹®È«¼®, À̱ٿì

|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in shear bonding strength between resin cements to dental materials when a universal primer (Monobond plus) was applied in place of a conventional primer.
Materials and methods: Four groups of testing materials: gold alloy (Argedent Euro, n = 16), non precious metal (T-4, n = 20), zirconia (Cercon, n = 20) and glass ceramic (IPS e.max press, n = 20), were fabricated into discs, which were embedded in an acrylic resin matrix. The gold alloy specimens were airborne-particle abraded, 8 of the specimens were coated with Metal primer II, while the remaining 8 specimens were coated with Monobond plus. The non precious and zirconia specimen were airborne-particle abraded then, the control group received Alloy primer coating, while the other was coated with Monobond plus. Glass ceramic specimens were etched. 10 specimens were coated with Monobond-S and the remaining specimens were coated using Monobond plus. On top of the surface, Multilink N was polymerized in a disc shape. All of the specimens were thermal cycled before the shear bonding strength was measured. Statistical analysis was done with Two sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test (¥á=.05).
Results: There were no significant differences in bonding strength depending on the type of primer used in the gold alloy and glass ceramic groups (P>.05), however, the bonding strengths of resin cements to non precious metal and zirconia groups, were significantly higher when the alloy primer was used (P<.05).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, improvement of universal primers which can be applied to all types of restorations is recommended to precious metals and zirconia ceramics. But, the bond strengths of non precious metals and zirconia ceramics were significantly lower when compared to a 10-MDP primer. More research is needed to apply universal primers to all types of restorations.
* Keywords: Universal primer; Silane; Phosphate monomer; Resin cement; Shear bond strength
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ½Ç¶õ°ú ÀÎ»ê ¸ð³ë¸Ó¸¦ È¥ÇÕÇÑ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸ÓÀÎ Monobond plus (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇßÀ» ¶§ ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®¿Í ¼öº¹¹° °£ÀÇ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ °µµ°¡ ±Í±Ý¼Ó, ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó, ±Û¶ó½º ¼¼¶ó¹Í°ú Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ³× °¡Áö Àç·á ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ӹ¦ »ç¿ëÇßÀ» ¶§ÀÇ °áÇÕ °µµ¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© À¯ÀÇÇÑÁö Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: µð½ºÅ© ¸ð¾ç(9 mm ¡¿ 3 mm)ÀÇ ±Í±Ý¼Ó(Argedent Euro) ½ÃÆí 16°³, ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó(T-4) ½ÃÆí 20°³, Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆ(Cercon) ½ÃÆí 20°³, ±Û¶ó½º ¼¼¶ó¹Í(IPS e.max press) ½ÃÆí 20°³¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ÈÄ ¾ÆÅ©¸±¸¯ ·¹Áø(15 mm ¡¿ 15 mm)¿¡ Æ÷¸ÅÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±Í±Ý¼Ó ½ÃÆí¿¡ airborne-particle abrasionÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëÇÑ 8°³ ½ÃÆí¿¡´Â ±Í±Ý¼Ó¿ë ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ó(Metal primer II)¸¦, ³ª¸ÓÁö 8°³ ½ÃÆí¿¡´Â Monobond plus¸¦ µµÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ½ÃÆí°ú Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ½ÃÆíÀº airborne-particle abrasion ÈÄ °¢°¢ µÎ ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ´ëÁ¶±º 10°³ ½ÃÆí¿¡´Â ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ¹× Áö¸£ÄڴϾƿë ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ó(Alloy primer)¸¦, ³ª¸ÓÁö 10°³¿¡´Â Monobond plus¸¦ µµÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±Û¶ó½º ¼¼¶ó¹Í ½ÃÆíÀº 4% ºÒ»êÀ¸·Î ºÎ½ÄÇÑ ÈÄ, ´ëÁ¶±º 10°³ ½ÃÆí¿¡´Â ½Ç¶õ(Monobond-S)À», ³ª¸ÓÁö 10°³¿¡´Â Monobond plus¸¦ Àû¿ëÇß´Ù. Ç¥¸é ó¸®µÈ ½ÃÆí À§¿¡ µð½ºÅ© ÇüÅÂ(5 mm ¡¿ 2 mm)·Î ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®(Multilink N)¸¦ À§Ä¡½Ã۰í ÁßÇÕÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¦ÀÛµÈ ¸ðµç ½ÃÆíÀ» ¿¼øÈ¯(5¡É¿Í 55¡É, 1ºÐ¾¿ 2060ȸ)½ÃŲ ÈÄ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ °µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àü´Ü °áÇÕ °µµÀÇ À¯ÀÇÂ÷¸¦ »ìÆìº¸±â À§ÇØ Shapiro-Wilk test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸ðÁý´ÜÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ËÁ¤À» ÇÏ°í ±× °á°ú¿¡ µû¶ó Two sample t-test ¶Ç´Â Mann-Whitney U test¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù(¥á=.05). ÆÄÀýµÈ ½ÃÆíÀ» È®´ë°æÀ¸·Î °üÂûÇÏ¿© ±× ¾ç»óÀ» ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ±Í±Ý¼Ó°ú ±Û¶ó½º ¼¼¶ó¹Í ±º¿¡¼´Â µÎ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ӱ£ÀÇ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ °µµ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̰¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸³ª(P> .05) ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ±º°ú Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ±º¿¡¼´Â ±âÁ¸ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ó(Alloy primer)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇßÀ» ¶§ ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®¿Í ¼öº¹¹°°£ÀÇ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ °µµ°¡ Monobond plus¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ ±ºº¸´Ù Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾Ò´Ù(ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ±º P=.004, Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ±º P=.001).
°á·Ð: ½Ç¶õ°ú ÀÎ»ê ¸ð³ë¸Ó¸¦ È¥ÇÕÇÑ ´Ù¿ëµµ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ӵ ±Í±Ý¼Ó°ú ±Û¶ó½º ¼¼¶ó¹Í ±º¿¡¼´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ӹ¦ ´ë½ÅÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó°ú Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ¼¼¶ó¹Í¿¡¼´Â 10-MDP ÇÁ¶óÀ̸ӿ¡ ºñÇØ Á¢Âø °µµ°¡ ³·¾Æ ±âÁ¸ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ӹ¦ ´ë½ÅÇÏ¿© Àû¿ëÇϱâ À§Çؼ´Â Á» ´õ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: ´Ù¿ëµµ ÇÁ¶óÀ̸Ó; ½Ç¶õ; ÀÎ»ê ¸ð³ë¸Ó; ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®; Àü´Ü °áÇÕ °µµ
|
|
1504 |
2012 |
50/2 |
106-111 |
Surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion to flexible denture base according to various polishing methods ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ź¼ºÀÇÄ¡ÀÇ Ç¥¸é°ÅÄ¥±â¿Í Candida albicansÀÇ ºÎÂøÀ² º¯È
Ju-Won Oh, Jae-Min Seo, Seung-Keun Ahn, Ju-Mi Park, Cheol-Kyun Kang, Kwang-Yeob Song
¿ÀÁÖ¿ø, ¼Àç¹Î, ¾È½Â±Ù, ¹ÚÁÖ¹Ì, °Ã¶±Õ, ¼Û±¤¿±

|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of 3 chairside polishing methods and laboratory polishing methods on surface roughness and C. albicans adhesion of polyamide denture base.
Materials and methods: Using contact profilometer, the surface of polyamide specimens (25¡¿15¡¿2 mm) was studied after conventional polishing without finishing and after chiarside polishing with 2 chiarside polishing kits and chairside-pumice polishing following finishing with tungsten carbide bur. To evaluate the adhesion of C. albicans, C. albicans suspension was overlayed on the test specimen. And the specimens were incubated for 2 hours. Imprint culture method was achieved and counted the colony on the agar plate. Polished polyamide were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. The statistics were conducted using one-way ANOVA and in case of difference, Scheffe test and Tamhane¡¯s T2 test were used.
Results: Surface roughness (Ra) of surfaces polished with 2 chairside polishing kits had higher than conventional polishing and pumice polishing. The highest roughness value was 0.32 ¡¾ 0.10 §, and the lowest was 0.02 ¡¾ 0.00 §. The adhesion of C. albicans on the specimens polished with chairside polishing group and pumice polishing group were increased than conventional polishing group (P<.01).
Conclusion: Conventional laboratory polishing was found to produce the smoothest surface and the lowest adhesion of C. albicans. Two groups polished with Chairside polishing kits were similar with respect to surface roughness. Surface of the specimen polished with pumice is significantly smoother than 2 chairside polishing groups, but the result of C. albicans adhesion is that group polished with pumice was similar with 2 chairside polishing groups (P>.01).
* Keywords: Polyamide denture base; Profilometer; Surface roughness; Polishing
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ź¼ºÀÇÄ¡ Á¦ÀÛ ½Ã ÁÖ·Î »ç¿ëµÇ´Â polyamide¸¦ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ó¸® ÈÄ Candida albicansÀÇ ºÎÂøÁ¤µµ¿Í Ç¥¸é°ÅÄ¥±â¸¦ ºñ±³ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 25¡¿15¡¿2 mm Å©±âÀÇ polyamide ½ÃÆíÀ» 4±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ¿¬¸¶À縦 »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ±â°ø¿ë lathe ¿¬¸¶ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý(±â°ø½Ç³» ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ý)°ú °¢±â ´Ù¸¥ 2Á¾ÀÇ ½Ç¸®ÄÜ Æ÷ÀÎÆ®·Î Áø·á½Ç³» ¿¬¸¶ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý, ±×¸®°í ½Ç¸®ÄÜÆ÷ÀÎÆ® ¿¬¸¶ ÈÄ pumice·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ó¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. C. albicansÀÇ ºÎÂø¼ºÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ 5¡¿106 CFU/mlÀÇ C. albicans ÇöŹ¾×¿¡ ½ÃÆíÀ» 2½Ã°£ µ¿¾È ħÀûÇÏ¿´°í 5ȸ ¼ö¼¼Ã³¸® ÈÄ ÇÑõ¹èÁö¿¡¼ ¹è¾çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚ Çö¹Ì°æ(JSM-5900, JEOL LTd., Tokyo, Japan) ÃÔ¿µÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Profilometer (Surf-pak; Kawasaki, Japan)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç¥¸é°ÅÄ¥±â¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í Åë°è󸮸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© SPSS 18.0 ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÏ¿øº¯·®ºÐ¼®À¸·Î ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´°í »çÈİËÁõÀº C. albicansÀÇ ºÎÂø¼º °ËÁõÀ» À§ÇØ Scheffe test¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ°ËÁõÀ» À§ÇØ Tamhane¡¯s T2 test¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù(¥á=.01).
°á°ú: ÃÖ´ë °ÅÄ¥±â °ªÀ» º¸ÀÎ ±ºÀº 2´Ü°èÀÇ ¿¬¸¶¿ë ¹ö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î 0.32 §¡¾0.10 °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸¸ç, °¡Àå ³·Àº °ÅÄ¥±â °ªÀ» º¸ÀÎ °ÍÀº tungsten carbide¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ±â°ø¿ë lathe·Î¸¸ ¿¬¸¶¸¦ ÇÑ ±ºÀ¸·Î 0.02 §¡¾0.00ÀÇ °ÅÄ¥±â °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. C. albicans ºÎÂø ½ÇÇè¿¡¼´Â ±â°ø¿ë lathe¸¸À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ýÀÌ °¡Àå ÀûÀº ºÎÂø¼ö¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç ´Ù¸¥ ¼¼ ±º°ú À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̰¡ ¹ß°ßµÇ¾ú´Ù(P<.01).
°á·Ð: Ç¥¸é°ÅÄ¥±â ¹× ¹Ì»ý¹° ºÎÂø´É ½ÇÇè °á°ú ±â°ø½Ç ¿¬¸¶¸¸À» ½ÃÇàÇÑ °æ¿ì À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·Àº °ÅÄ¥±â °ª°ú ºÎÂøÀ²À» º¸¿´´Ù. Pumice·Î Ãß°¡ ¿¬¸¶ÇÑ ±ºÀº Áø·á½Ç¿¬¸¶¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ³·Àº °ÅÄ¥±â °ªÀ» º¸¿´À¸³ª C. albicans ºÎÂø¿¡ À־ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(P>.01).
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: Æú¸®¾Æ¸¶À̵å ÀÇÄ¡»ó; ÃËħ½Ä Ç¥¸é°ÅÄ¥±â ÃøÁ¤±â; Ç¥¸é°ÅÄ¥±â; ¿¬¸¶
|
|
1503 |
2012 |
50/2 |
99-105 |
Three-dimensional finite element analysis for influence of marginal bone resorption on stress distribution in internal conical joint type implant fixture º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö°¡ ³»Ãø¿¬°á ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸Å½ÄüÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
Mi-Jung Yun, Min-Chul Yoon, Tae-Gwan Eom, Jung-Bo Huh, Chang-Mo Jeong
À±¹ÌÁ¤, À±¹Îö, ¾öŰü, ÇãÁߺ¸, Á¤Ã¢¸ð

|
|
Purpose: The change of the marginal bone around dental implants have significance not only for the functional maintenance but also for the esthetic success of the implant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the load transfer of internal conical joint type implant according to marginal bone resorption by using the three-dimensional finite element analysis model.
Materials and methods: The internal conical joint type system was selected as an experimental model. Finite element models of bone/implant/prosthesis complex were constructed. A load of 300 N was applied vertically beside 3 mm of implant axis.
Results: The pattern of stress distribution according to marginal bone resorption was similar. The maximum equivalent stress of implant was increase according to marginal bone resorption and the largest maximum equivalent stress was shown at model of 1 mm marginal bone resorption. Although marginal bone loss more than 1mm was occurred increasing of stress, the width of the stress increase was decreasing.
Conclusion: According to these results, the exposure of thin neck portion of internal conical joint type implant is most important factor in stress increasing.
* Keywords: Internal conical joint type implant; Marginal bone resoprtion; Three-dimensional finite element analysis
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: Áö±Ý±îÁö ¼º°øÀûÀÎ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇØ ¸¹Àº ¿¬±¸°¡ ÁøÇàµÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸¸ç, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖº¯ °ñ Èí¼ö Çö»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¸Å¿ì °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ôÀº ºÐ¾ß Áß ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â »ïÂ÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÀÀ·ÂºÐ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö°¡ ³»Ãø¿¬°á ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸Å½ÄüÀÇ ±â°èÀû ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» °£Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î È®ÀÎÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ¾Ç°ñ¿¡ ½Ä¸³µÈ ³»Ãø¿¬°á ÇüÅÂÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸Å½Äü¿¡ ƼŸ´½ ¼ÒÀçÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ Áö´ëÁÖ ³ª»ç·Î ¿¬°áÇÏ°í »óºÎ¿¡ ±ÝÇձݰüÀ» ÀåÂøÇÏ´Â »ïÂ÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¸ðÇüÀ» ¼³°èÇÏ¿´´Ù. 0, 1, 2, 3 mmÀÇ º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö »óŸ¦ Àû¿ëÇϰí, ±³ÇÕ¸é Á߽ɿ¡¼ºÎÅÍ 3 mm ÆíÃø¿¡ 300 NÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸Å½Äü¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÃÖ´ë ÁÖÀÀ·ÂÀ» °è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®°á°ú º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸Å½ÄüÀÇ ÃÖ´ë ÁÖÀÀ·Â ºÐÆ÷´Â À¯»çÇÑ ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸Å½Äü »ó´Ü¿¡¼ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ÀÀ·Â ÁýÁßÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÃÖ´ë ÁÖÀÀ·ÂÀº óÀ½ 1 mm º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö¸¦ °¡Á¤ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ °¡Àå Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÌÈÄ º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ÀÀ·ÂÀº Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´Áö¸¸ ÀÀ·Â Áõ°¡ÀÇ ÆøÀº °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
°á·Ð: ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú·ÎºÎÅÍ ³»Ãø¿¬°á ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡¼ ¸Å½Äü µÎ²²°¡ ¾ãÀº °æºÎÀÇ ³ëÃâÀº º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÀÀ·Â Áõ°¡¿¡ °¡Àå Å« ¿øÀÎÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¸Å½ÄüÀÇ º¯Çü, ±Õ¿ ¹× ÆÄÀý µîÀÇ ±â°èÀû ½ÇÆÐ¸¦ °¨¼Ò½Ã۱â À§Çؼ´Â ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿Ü°úÀû, º¸Ã¶Àû °í·Á°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö; »ïÂ÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÀÀ·ÂºÐ¼®; ³»Ãø¿¬°á ÀÓÇöõÆ®
|
|
1502 |
2012 |
50/2 |
92-98 |
Effect of various abutment systems on the removal torque and the abutment settling in the conical connection implant systems ¿øÃßÇü ¿¬°á ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡¼ Áö´ëÁÖ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ ³ª»çÇ®¸²°ú ħÇÏÇö»ó¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
Jin-Seon Lee, Joon-Seok Lee
ÀÌÁø¼±, ÀÌÁؼ®

|
|
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different abutment materials on abutment screw loosening and settling-down effect in conical connection type implant system.
Materials and methods: Three types of abutment, cementation, gold UCLA, and metal UCLA abutment were used. Two UCLA groups were fabricated in a similar pattern to cementation abutment. Type III gold alloy and Nickel-Chromium alloy was used for casting gold UCLA abutment and metal UCLA abutment, respectively. Fixture and abutment were tightened to 30 Ncm by using digital torque controller and re-tightening was conducted with same force after 10 minutes. Digital torque gauge was used to measure loosening torque and fixture/abutment length was measured by digital micrometer. Dynamic loads between 25 N and 250 N were applied with 0 degree angle to the abutment axis. After loading, fixture/abutment length was re-measured and amount of settlement was calculated. Loosening torque value was also measured for comparison.
Results: All three groups showed significant differences of length when comparing before and after loading, but there was no significant difference of settling amount in all groups. Loosening torque values were significantly decreased when comparing before and after loading in all groups(P<.05). However, there was no significant difference in loss of loosening torque values when compared to groups.
Conclusion: In internal conical connection type implants, dynamic load affected on settlement and loosening torque of implant, but there was no differences between abutments materials. Likewise gold UCLA abutment, metal UCLA abutment might be able to withstand functional load.
* Keywords: Metal UCLA abutment; Settling effect; Dynamic loading; Implant-abutment
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀûÀº ¼·Î ´Ù¸¥ Àç·á·Î Á¦ÀÛµÈ Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© µ¿ÀûÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇßÀ» ¶§ Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©¿Í ħÇÏ·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ®-Áö´ëÁÖ ¿¬°áºÎÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¾Ë¾Æº¸´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ¿øÃßÇü ³»ºÎ¿¬°á ±¸Á¶¸¦ °®´Â ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â ¼¼ °¡Áö Áö´ëÁÖ, ƼŸ´½ ÇÕ±Ý Áö´ëÁÖ(Cement abutment, Osstem Co., Seoul, Korea), ±Í±Ý¼Ó UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ(UCLA Goldcast abutment, Osstem Co., Seoul, Korea), ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ(CCM Metalcast abutment, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±Í±Ý¼Ó UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í ºñ±Í±Ý ¼Ó UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ ƼŸ´½ Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í À¯»çÇÑ ÇüÅ·Π³³ÇüÀ» Çü¼º ÇÑ ÈÄ °¢°¢ Á¦ 3Çü ±ÝÇÕ±Ý(E-3, Heesung catalyst Co., Seoul, Korea)¿Í ´ÏÄÌ-Å©·Ò ÇÕ±ÝÀÎ(Rexillium III(R), Pentron(R), San Diego, USA)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÁÖÁ¶ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ µðÁöÅÐ ÅäÅ© ÄÁÆ®·Ñ·¯¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 30 Ncm·Î ü°áÇÏ¿´°í ÀüÇÏÁß »ó½ÇÀ» º¸»óÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© 10ºÐ ÈÄ ´Ù½Ã °°Àº ÈûÀ¸·Î ü°á ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µðÁöÅÐ ÅäÅ© °ÔÀÌÁö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í µðÁöÅÐ ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î¹ÌÅ͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ®/Áö´ëÁÖ ±æÀ̸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× ÈÄ µ¿Àû ÇÏÁß ÇÇ·Î ½ÃÇè±â¿¡ Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ ÀåÂøÇÑ ÈÄ ÃÖ´ë 250 N, ÃÖ¼Ò 25 N, ÁÖ±â 14 HZÀÇ sineÇüÀÇ ÇÏÁßÀ» ÀåÃà°ú ÆòÇàÇÏ°Ô °¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÏÁß ÈÄ ÀÓÇöõÆ®/Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ ±æÀ̸¦ ÀçÃøÁ¤ Çϰí, ÀüÈÄ ±æÀÌ º¯È·®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ħÇÏ·®À» °è»êÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ÇÏÁß ÀüÈÄÀÇ ±æÀ̸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ¼¼ ±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(P<.05). ±º °£ÀÇ Ä§ÇÏ·®À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö´Â ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÇÏÁß ÀüÈÄÀÇ Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ¿ª½Ã ¼¼ ±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌ¸ç °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù (P<.05). ÇÏÁß Àü Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©¿Í ÇÏÁß ÈÄ Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©¸¦ ±º°£ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö´Â ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
°á·Ð: ¿øÃßÇü ³»ºÎ ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¸¦ °®´Â ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡¼ µ¿ÀûÇÏÁßÀº ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ Ä§ÇÏ·®°ú Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸À̳ª Áö´ëÁÖ°£ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó UCLA Áö´ëÁÖÀÌ »ç¿ëÀº ±Í±Ý¼Ó UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î ±â´ÉÀû ÇÏÁß¿¡¼ ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: ºñ±Í±Ý¼ÓUCLA Áö´ëÁÖ; Á¤ÂøÈ¿°ú; µ¿ÀûÇÏÁß; ÀÓÇöõÆ®-Áö´ëÁÖ
|
|
1501 |
2012 |
50/2 |
85-91 |
Effect of various casting alloys and abutment composition on the marginal accuracy of bar-type retainer ÇÕ±ÝÀÇ Á¾·ù¿Í Áö´ëÁÖ ¼ººÐÀÌ ¹ÙÇü À¯Áö ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ º¯¿¬ ÀûÇÕµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
Yun-Hui Lee, Young-Gyun Song, Joon-Seok Lee
ÀÌÀ±Èñ, ¼Û¿µ±Õ, ÀÌÁؼ®

|
|
Purpose: The object of this study was to determine if the low-priced alloy and metal UCLA abutment could be available for manufacturing bar-retained framework of implant prosthesis.
Materials and methods: Bar structure was classified into 4 groups, The specimen of group 1 and 2 were based on casting high noble metal alloys and noble metal alloys with gold UCLA abutment. The specimen of group 3 and 4 were based on casting noble metal alloys and base metal alloys with metal UCLA abutment. Cast bar structure was installed in an acrylic resin model and only the screw on the hexed abutment side was tightened to 20 Ncm. On the opposite side, vertical discrepancy was measured with stereo microscope from front, back, and lateral side of the implant-abutment interface. One-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the marginal fit discrepancy.
Results: One-way ANOVA test showed significant differences among all groups (P<.05) except for Group 1 and 3. Among them, difference between Group 1 and 2 was noticeable. Measured vertical discrepancies were all below 70 § except to Group 2.
Conclusion: Base metal alloy and metal UCLA abutment could be used as an alternative to high-priced gold alloy for implant bar-retained framework.
* Keywords: Metal UCLA abutment; Bar attachment; Marginal adaptation; Base metal alloy
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: ÇÕ±ÝÀÇ Á¾·ù¿Í Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ ÀçÁúÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ º¯¿¬ÀûÇÕµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 2°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯»çü¸¦ ÆòÇàÇÏ°Ô À§Ä¡½ÃŲ ÈÄ ¾ÆÅ©¸±¸¯ ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î Æ÷¸ÅÇÏ¿© ¿¬±¸¸ðÇüÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ù ±¸Á¶¹°Àº gold UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ °í±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±Ý(high noble metal alloy)°ú ±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±Ý(noble metal alloy)À», ±×¸®°í metal UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ °í±Í±Ý¼Ó Çձݰú ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±Ý(base metal alloy)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃÑ 4 Á¾·ùÀÇ ¹Ù ±¸Á¶¹°À» 7°³¾¿ ½ÃÆíÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖÁ¶µÈ ¹Ù ±¸Á¶¹°À» ·¹Áø ¸ðÇü¿¡ ÀåÂøÇϰí ÇÑÂÊ Áö´ë³ª»ç¸¦ Á¶ÀÎ ÈÄ, ¹Ý´ëÂÊ ÀÓÇöõÆ®-Áö´ëÁÖ °£±ØÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ °Å¸®¸¦ ¾Õ, µÚ, Ãø¸é 3ºÎÀ§¿¡¼ ÀÔü ±¤ÇÐ Çö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î °üÂûÇÏ¿© ±â·ÏÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: °¢ ±ºµéÀÇ º¯¿¬¿ÀÂ÷ Æò±Õ°ªÀº gold UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ °í±Í±Ý¼Ó Çձݰú ±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±ÝÀ» »ç¿ëÇßÀ» ¶§ °¢°¢ 13.69 ¡¾ 6.74 §¿Í 267.26 ¡¾ 65.85 §À̾úÀ¸¸ç, metal UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¿¡ °í±Í±Ý¼Ó Çձݰú ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±ÝÀ» »ç¿ëÇßÀ» ¶§ 26.19 ¡¾ 8.14 §¿Í 61.90 ¡¾ 33.65 §À̾ú´Ù. One-way ANOVA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© º¯¿¬ ÀûÇÕµµÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇßÀ» ¶§ °í±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÔ±ÝÀ» »ç¿ëÇÑ ±ºµéÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇϰí, ¸ðµç ±º°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̰¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù(P<.05). Gold UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ-±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±Ý Á¶ÇÕÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í ¸ðµÎ 70 § ÀÌÇÏÀÇ ¼öÁ÷¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
°á·Ð: ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¹Ù À¯Áö ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ Á¦ÀÛ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ °í±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±Ý ´ë½Å ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó Çձݰú metal UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ÀÓ»óÀû Ÿ´ç¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: Metal UCLA Áö´ëÁÖ; ¹Ù À¯ÁöÀåÄ¡; º¯¿¬ÀûÇÕµµ; ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±Ý
|
|
1500 |
2012 |
50/1 |
67-73 |
Customized abutment and screw-type implant prostheses after cementation based on the digital intra-oral impression technique ±¸° ³» µðÁöÅÐ Àλó䵿À» ÅëÇÑ ¸ÂÃãÇü Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í ½Ã¸àÆ® ÇÕÂø ÈÄ ³ª»çÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶ ¼öº¹ Áõ·Ê
Yong-Shin Hong, Eun-Jin Park, Sun-Jong Kim, Myung-Rae Kim, Seong-Joo Heo, Ji-Man Park
È«¿ë½Å∙¹ÚÀºÁø∙±è¼±Á¾∙±è¸í·¡∙Ç㼺ÁÖ∙¹ÚÁö¸¸

|
|
Fixed dental prostheses such as inlay, onlay, crown, and bridge fabricated by CAD/CAM technique combined with digital impressions is getting popular due to the recent rapid progress of digital impression taking system. For the scope of implant prosthesis, however, digital intra-oral scan hasn¡¯t been actively utilized for the fabrication of superstructures. In this case report, 6 cases of titanium-milled custom abutment based on the iTero intra-oral scan data were introduced, five of them were restored with screw-type prosthesis after cementation (SCRP) and the clinical results were satisfactory on restoring the function and esthetics. * Keywords: Intraoral scanner; Dental implant; Customized abutment
ÃÖ±Ù µðÁöÅÐ Àλó䵿 ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ¸é¼ À̸¦ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ CAD/CAM ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú Á¢¸ñÇÑ Àη¹ÀÌ, ¿Â·¹ÀÌ, Å©¶ó¿îÀ̳ª °£´ÜÇÑ °è¼Ó°¡°øÀÇÄ¡ µîÀÇ °íÁ¤¼º º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ Á¦ÀÛÀÌ È°¹ßÈ÷ ¼Ò°³µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶¿¡¼´Â ÁÖ·Î ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¾Æ³¯·Î±×½Ä Àλó䵿 ÈÄ À̸¦ ½ºÄµÇÏ¿© Á¦ÀÛÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸³ª, ±¸° ³» µðÁöÅÐ ½ºÄµÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ³ª»çÇü º¸Ã¶¹°À» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ´Â ¼ú½ÄÀº ¾ÆÁ÷ Ȱ¹ßÈ÷ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» Áõ·Êº¸°í¿¡¼´Â 6¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ±¸° ³» ½ºÄ³³ÊÀÎ iTero¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© µðÁöÅÐ ½ºÄµÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ÈÄ ±×Áß ´Ù¼¸¸íÀº ¸ÂÃãÇü Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í ½Ã¸àÆ® ÇÕÂø ÈÄ ³ª»çÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°(screw-retained implant prosthesis after cementation, or SCRP)À» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ±â´É°ú ½É¹ÌÀûÀÎ Ãø¸éÀ¸·Î ¸¸Á·ÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú±â¿¡ À̸¦ º¸°íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: ±¸° ³» ½ºÄ³³Ê Ä¡°ú¿ë ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸ÂÃãÇü Áö´ëÁÖ
|
|
1499 |
2012 |
50/1 |
61-66 |
A 15-year clinical retrospective study of Branemark implants Branemark ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ 15³â ÀÓ»óÀû ÈÄÇâ ¿¬±¸
Hyo-Jin Park, Young-Ye Cho, Jong-Eun Kim, Yong-Geun Choi, Jeong-Yol Lee, Sang-Wan Shin
¹ÚÈ¿Áø∙Á¶¿µ¾Ö∙±èÁ¾Àº∙ÃÖ¿ë±Ù∙ÀÌÁ¤¿∙½Å»ó¿Ï

|
|
PURPOSE. This study was to compare the cumulative survival rate (CSR) of Branemark machined surface implants and TiUniteTM imlants and to analyze association between risk factors and the CSR of the implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective study design was used to collect long-term follow-up clinical data from dental records of 156 patients treated with 541 BraNnemark machined and TiUniteTM implants at Korea University Guro hospital in South Korea from 1993 through 2008. Machined implant and TiUniteTM implant were compared by CSR. Exposure variables such as gender, systemic disease, location, implant length, diameter, prosthesis type, opposing occlusion type, date of implant placement, type of edentulous space, abutment type, existence of splinting with natural teeth, and existence of cantilever were collected. Life table analysis was undertaken to examine the CSR. Cox regression method was conducted to assess the association between potential risk factors and overall CSR (¥á=.05).
RESULTS. Patient ages ranged from 16 to 75 years old (mean age, 51 years old). Implants were more frequently placed in men than women (94 men versus 63 women). Since 1993, 264 Branemark machined implants were inserted in 79 patients and since 2001, 277 TiUniteTM implants were inserted in 77 patients. A total survival rate of 86.07% was observed in Branemark and Nobel Biocare TiUniteTM during 15 years. A survival rate of machined implant during 15 years was 82.89% and that of TiUniteTM implant during 5 years was 98.74%. The implant CSR revealed lower rates association with several risk factors such as, systemic disease, other accompanied surgery, implant location, and Kennedy classification.
CONCLUSION. Clinical performance of Branemark machined and TiUniteTM implant demonstrated a high level of predictability. In this study, TiUniteTM implant was more successful than machined implant. The implant CSR was associated with several risk factors. * Keywords: Dental implant; Retrospective; Cumulative survival rate; Risk factors
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â Branemark ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ÈÄÇâÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ machined ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÀÇ 15³â, TiUniteTM ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ 5³â ´©Àû »ýÁ¸À²À» ±¸ÇÏ¿© ºñ±³Çϰí, À§Çè ¿ä¼Ò¿ÍÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¹àÈ÷°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý:º» ¿¬±¸´Â 1993³âºÎÅÍ 2008³â±îÁö °í·Á´ë ±¸·Îº´¿ø ÀÓÇöõƮŬ¸®´Ð¿¡¼ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿©, ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÓ»ó±â·ÏÀ» Åä´ë·Î Á¶»ç ÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÀÏÂ÷¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Áï½Ã ºÎÇϸ¦ °¡ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú °áÇÕÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â Á¦¿ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù. 15³â °£ ÃÑ 155¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡°Ô 541°³ÀÇ Branemark ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áß, 264 °³ÀÇ machined ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í 277°³ÀÇ TiUniteTM ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¼ö¼ú ¹× º¸Ã¶¼öº¹ ¼ú½ÄÀº Adell µîÀÌ Á¦¾ÈÇÑ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ú´Ù. 6°³¿ù¿¡¼ 1³â °£°ÝÀ¸·Î Follow-upÀ» À§ÇÑ Àç³»¿ø ±â°£ µ¿¾È ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °üÂû ±â°£Àº 1 Â÷ ¼ö¼úÀϷκÎÅÍ 2008³â 12¿ù À̳»ÀÇ ÃÖÁ¾ ³»¿øÀϱîÁö¿´°í, ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç½Ã µ¿¿äµµ, ŸÁø, screw loosening, ±×¸®°í ȯÀÚÀÇ ºÒÆí°¨ µîÀ» °üÂûÇϰí, Zarb¿Í Albreksson¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ® »ýÁ¸ ¹üÁÖ¸¦ ±Ù°Å·Î ´©Àû»ýÁ¸·üÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀÓÇöõÆ® ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²(CSR)ÀÌ Kaplan Meier estimate¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾ò¾úÀ¸¸ç, °¢°¢ÀÇ À§Çè¿ä¼Ò°¡ ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Cox proportional hazards regressionÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù(¥á=.05).
°á°ú: Àüü Branemark ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ 15³â ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²Àº 86.07%À̾ú°í, machined ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ °æ¿ì 15³â ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²Àº 82.89%, 5³â ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²Àº 89.21%¿´À¸³ª TiuniteTM ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ 5³â ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²Àº 98.74%·Î machined surface°¡ TiuniteTM ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ºñÇØ ½ÇÆÐÀ²ÀÌ 4.6¹è Á¤µµ ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. Àü½ÅÁúȯÀ» °¡Áø ȯÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì ½ÇÆÐÀ²ÀÌ 32% ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, »ó¾Çµ¿ °Å»ó¼ú ¶Ç´Â °ñÀ̽ÄÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ ¼ö¼ú µî ºÎ°¡ÀûÀÎ ¼ö¼úÀ» ¹ÞÀº °æ¿ì ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½ÇÆÐÀ²ÀÌ 40% ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿© À§Çè ¿ä¼Ò¿Í ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ »ýÁ¸À²Àº »ó°ü °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Kennedy ºÐ·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÎºÐ ¹«Ä¡¾ÇºÎÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½ÇÆÐÀ²ÀÌ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ´Þ¶úÀ¸¸ç, ¼Ò±¸Ä¡¿Í ±¸Ä¡ºÎ°¡±¸Ä¡ºÎ°¡ ÀüÄ¡ºÎ¿¡ ºñÇØ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½ÇÆÐÀ²ÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
°á·Ð: Branemark machined ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í TiUniteTM ÀÓÇöõÆ®´Â ¸ðµÎ ¿ì¼öÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª, TiUniteTM ÀÓÇöõÆ®°¡ ´õ ¼º°øÀûÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ´©Àû »ýÁ¸À²Àº À§Çè¿ä¼Ò¿Í ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: ÀÓÇöõÆ®; ÈÄÇâÀû; ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²; À§Çè¿ä¼Ò
|
|
1498 |
2012 |
50/1 |
53-60 |
Study on the effect of soldering methods on the characteristics of the Ni-Cr alloy ³³Âø ¹æ¹ýÀÌ Ä¡°ú¿ë ±Ý¼ÓÀÇ ¼º»ó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
Chul-Hyung Kim, Young-Gyun Song, Jong-Hyuk Lee
±èöÇü∙¼Û¿µ±Õ∙ÀÌÁ¾Çõ

|
|
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare Ni-Cr alloy property of gas-oxygen torch soldering and infrared welding using optical microscope and Electron Probe Micro Analyzer (EPMA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ni-Cr alloys were casted for specimens. Specimens had 3.0 mm diameter, 30.0 mm length and were divided into two groups. Each group had 4 specimens. One group was for gas-oxygen torch soldering and the other was infrared welding. Specimens were cut with low-speed disc and soldered each other with gas-oxygen torch and infrared machine. After soldering and polishing, specimens were observed at 3 points (soldering point, 5 mm distance point, 10 mm distance point) with optical microscope and analyzed 3 points (soldering point, 5 mm distance point, 10 mm distance point with EPMA.
RESULTS. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The observation of gas-oxygen torch soldering at 10 mm distance point under the optical microscope was not founded any specific surface properties, but some crack lines were observed at 5 mm distance and soldering point. 2. There were no crack lines were founded at the observation of infrared welding at 10 mm distance and 5 mm distance points under the optical microscope. However, at the 5 mm distance, the surface was not smooth enough compared with at 10 mm distance point. Some crack lines were observed at the welding point as well. 3. In the EPMA analysis of the gas-oxygen torch soldering, the component of Ni was increased by 4.5%, Cr was increased by 7.5% than that of the Ni-Cr alloy at the 10.0 mm distance. At the 5 mm distance, the component of Ni was decreased by 6.1%, Mo was increased by 9.0% than that of the Ni-Cr alloy but Cr was equally shown at the 5.0 mm distance. Only Ni was shown at the soldering point. 4. In the EPMA analysis of the infrared welding, the component of Ni was increased by 9.1%, Cr was increased by 0.4% than that of the Ni-Cr alloy but Al was equal at the 10.0 mm distance. At the 5 mm distance, the component of Ni was increased by 4.7%, Cr was increased by 4.7% and Al was increased by 0.1% than that of the Ni-Cr alloy. At the welding point, the component of Ni was increased by 8.8%, Cr was increased by 8.2% than that of the Ni-Cr alloy.
CONCLUSION.From these results, at the 5 mm distance from the soldering point, the surface of the infrared welding was more smoother than that of the gas-oxygen torch soldering. On the EPMA analysis, the component of the specimens with infrared welding was more similar than that of the gas-oxygen torch soldering compared with the component of the Ni-Cr alloy.
* Keywords: Gas-oxygen torch soldering; infrared welding; Optical microscope; EPMA
¿¬±¸ ¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â Ä¡°ú¿µ¿ª¿¡¼ ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ºñ±Í±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±ÝÀÎ ´ÏÄÌ-Å©·Ò ÇÕ±ÝÀ» »ê¼Ò-¾Æ¼¼Æ¿·» ºÒ²É ³³Âø¹ý°ú Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇØ ¿ëÁ¢ÇÏ°í ¿ëÁ¢ºÎ ¹× ±× ÁÖº¯À» ±¤ÇÐ Çö¹Ì°æ°ú EPMA (Electron Probe Micro Analyzer, ÀüÀڹ̼¼Çö¹ÌºÐ¼®±â)¸¦ ÅëÇØ °üÂûÇÏ¿© ¿ëÁ¢¹æ¹ýÀÌ ±Ý¼ÓÀÇ ¼º»ó(ILIL)¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý:´ÏÄÌ-Å©·Ò ÇÕ±ÝÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 3.0 mm Á÷°æ, 30 mm ±æÀÌÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÃÆíÀº »ê¼Ò-¾Æ¼¼Æ¿·» ºÒ²É ³³Âø¹ý, Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢¹ýÀÇ µÎ °³ÀÇ ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù(n = 4). ½ÃÆíÀ» low-speed disc·Î ÀÚ¸¥ ÈÄ °¢°¢À» »ê¼Ò-¾Æ¼¼Æ¿·» ÅäÄ¡¿Í Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ ¿ëÁ¢ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ëÁ¢°ú ¸¶¹«¸® ÈÄ¿¡ ½ÃÆíÀ» ±¤ÇÐÇö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î ¿ëÁ¢ºÎ, 5 mm ¶³¾îÁø ÁöÁ¡, 10 mm ¶³¾îÁø ÁöÁ¡ÀÇ 3°³ ºÎÀ§¿¡¼ °üÂûÇϰíEPMA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ±¤ÇÐ Çö¹Ì°æ °üÂû °á°ú ¿ëÁ¢ºÎ¿¡¼´Â µÎ ¹æ¹ý ¸ðµÎ ´Ù¼öÀÇ ÆÄÀý¼±ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú°í, 10.0 mm ¶³¾îÁø °Å¸®¿¡¼´Â µÎ ¹æ¹ý ¸ðµÎ ½ÃÆíÀÇ Ç¥¸é¿¡¼ ÆÄÀý¼±ÀÌ ¹ß°ßµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸³ª 5.0 mm ¶³¾îÁø °Å¸®¿¡¼´Â Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢¹ý¿¡¼´Â ½ÃÆíÀÇ Ç¥¸éÀÌ ´Ù¼Ò °ÅÄ¥±â´Â ÇßÀ¸³ª ÆÄÀý¼±Àº ¹ß°ßµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í »ê¼Ò-¾Æ¼¼Æ¿·» ºÒ²É ³³Âø Ç¥¸é¿¡¼´Â ´Ù¼öÀÇ ÆÄÀý¼±ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. EPMAºÐ¼®¿¡¼ Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¹æ¹ý¿¡¼´Â ¿ëÁ¢ºÎÀ§, 5.0 mm ¶³¾îÁø ºÎÀ§, 10.0 mm ¶³¾îÁø ºÎÀ§ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼ ½ÃÆí ±Ý¼ÓÀÇ ±¸¼º¼ººÐ ºñÀ²ÀÌ Á¦Á¶»çÀÇ ±¸¼º¼ººÐ ºñÀ²°ú 10.0%À̳»ÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú°í, »ê¼Ò-¾Æ¼¼Æ¿·» ºÒ²É ³³Âø¹ý¿¡¼´Â 5.0, 10.0 mm¿¡¼´Â ½ÃÆí±Ý¼ÓÀÇ ±¸¼º¼ººÐÀÌ 10.0%À̳»ÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸³ª, ³³Âø ºÎÀ§¿¡¼´Â Ni¸¸ÀÌ °ËÃâµÇ¾î Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢¹ý°ú´Â Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ºÐ¼®°á°ú¸¦ »ìÆì º¼ ¶§ Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢À» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ½ÃÆíÀÇ ±¸¼º ¼ººÐÀÌ ¸ð±Ý¼ÓÀÇ ¼ººÐ°ú À¯»çÇÑ °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
°á·Ð: ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î »ê¼Ò-¾Æ¼¼Æ¿·» ºÒ²É ³³Âø¹ýº¸´Ù Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¶§, ±Ý¼ÓÀÇ °áÇÔ ¹× ¼ººÐÀÇ º¯È°¡ Àû¾î¼ Á» ´õ ¿ì¼öÇÑ ±Ý¼Ó º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ Á¦ÀÛÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
* ÁÖ¿ä´Ü¾î: ±¤ÇÐÇö¹Ì°æ »ê¼Ò-¾Æ¼¼Æ¿·» ºÒ²É ³³Âø¹ý Àû¿Ü¼± ¿ëÁ¢¹ý EPMA
|
|
|
|
Per Page, 1496 Searched |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|